The issue in Ferguson, Missouri is difficult to follow, and
to figure out who is to blame. The public is obviously stating their opinion to
the nation in who they think is in the wrong. In most situations the police are
using riot gear to “protect” the community. “Police officers in riot gear over
reacted by trying to shut the media down. They tear-gassed a TV crew working on
a stand-up two blocks from the action. That is standard operating procedure in
Syria, not the United States”(http://www.wdrb.com/story/26319335/pov-ferguson-missouri-how-not-to-handle-a-crisis-81914). An affective picture I saw today was about a dozen police
wearing riot gear aiming their weapons to a unarmed person; isn’t that what
took place in the incident that caused this?
Another issue is how the local police are treating the video evidence;
the use of the video is considered “irrelevant”. But the video is relevant; it
basically shows the teen is a troublemaker. Also the federal government gave the local
police all the military type weapons they are using. "He shot again and once my friend felt that shot he
turned around and put his hands in the air and started to get down, and the
officer still approached with his weapon drawn and fired several more
shots."( http://www.cbsnews.com/news/thousands-march-at-vigil-for-teen-killed-in-police-shooting). Another reporter stated that the military
isn’t allowed to point their weapons at unarmed suspects. “The White House-led review will consider whether the
government should continue providing such equipment and, if so, whether local
authorities have sufficient training to use it appropriately, said senior
administration and law enforcement officials. The government will also consider
whether it is keeping a close enough watch on equipment inventories, and how
the weapons and other gear are used”( http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2014/08/23/obama-orders-review-arming-police-with-military-grade-tools/2fdn3Vf4LpQg8NVHi7zZjM/story.html). But the police are using the military
weapons, so they are not properly trained to be using those weapons. Which also
says that the police are not there to protect the people of the community, but
basically defending themselves from them.
Tuesday, August 26, 2014
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
Networking In America
In this episode they were finally getting their sample for
the denim line. Ben tried contacting his friend, but the calls were never
successful. They managed to meet Ben’s high school friend that has established
himself as a successful man in the denim industry. All of them sat for a cup of
coffee and they pitched their denim line to them, his friend seemed interested
and hooked them up to pitch their line again to a Japanese designer. “Share your passion. Win people over with your enthusiasm for your product or
service. Leave a lasting impression by telling a story about why you were
inspired to create your company. Talking about what you enjoy is often
contagious, too. When you get other people to share their passion, it creates a
memorable two-way conversation” (http://www.entrepreneur.com).
Both Ben and Cam went to pick up their denim from the manufacture, and
what they received isn’t what they had in mind. Ben refused to go meet the
Japanese designer but Cam didn’t get discouraged and went. Ben met up with him
at the designer’s office, but a couple of things they did wrong was have
business cards ready, and having more jeans to show. They finally met with the
designer and he didn’t like their jeans. But while they were leaving he noticed
Ben’s shirt, and he asked to make 300 more. Cam accepted immediately, and they
had their first deal. “Remember, networking is all
about relationship building. Keep your exchange fun, light and informal – you
don't need to do the hard sell within minutes of meeting a person. The idea is
to get the conversation started. People are more apt to do business with – or
partner with – people whose company they enjoy.”(http://www.entrepreneur.com). Cam is great at that; he is enthusiastic
about getting their line out there to as many people as he can.” Remember to follow up. It's often said that networking is where the conversation
begins, not ends. If you've had a great exchange, ask your conversation partner
the best way to stay in touch.”(http://www.entrepreneur.com).
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
Hot Coffee Case
The infamous “Hot Coffee” case where a 79-year-old woman,
Stella Liebeck, spilled McDonald’s on her lap. The actual facts state that
after purchasing the coffee she got into the car, which her grandson was
driving, and she put the coffee in her lap attempting to take the lid off of
it. While removing the lip the 180-190 degree coffee spilled all over her lap
causing third-degree burns on her thighs and groin areas. After being
hospitalized she settle a claim for $20,000 but McDonald’s refused. McDonald’s
had many previous cases about their hot coffee, but none of them were taken
seriously except this one. Later she
sent a letter asking to pay for her medical expenses, McDonald’s gave her $800
after they received her letter. She then went to court few more times; she said
that she was not in it for the money. Liebeck just wanted the coffee to be
lowered to a comfortable temperature.
McDonald’s sell to mostly sell the coffee to customers that are on their
way to work, so they think that they will drink it when they get there not in
the car. They also said the customers
want the coffee hot, so that’s how they always made it. The company also said
that there is not a warning side but a “reminder” that the coffee is hot. The jury
said that Liebeck was 20 percent at fault for what happened, so the compensation
damages were cut to $160,000, but rewarded her $2.7 million in punitive
damages. The money she received oddly equaled two days of coffee sales at
McDonald’s. After the trial a local McDonald’s said that they lowered the
coffee temperature to a comfortable 158 degrees. In my opinion both McDonald’s
and Liebeck were at fault. Yes the coffee was hot, but it was her choice to
open the coffee in the car.
Monday, August 4, 2014
More in America Week 3
Ben and Cam compliment each other really well. Ben usually
thinks before he acts on things; and Cam on the other hand is more ambitious
and doesn’t think of what could be the end result. Ben superpower in this
episode would have to be the knowledge he has for denim. He studied in an art
college, and he says he’s been wearing denim for fifth teen years of his
life. Cam on the other hand; works for
anything that has to do with money. He is constantly on his grind for the denim
line they are trying to peruse. That is
also Cam’s best value, and this episode demonstrates that he does what ever he
has to do to make money for the pattern cutter. Their denim is styled by 1970s
punk rock and hip-hop; their “Crisp” will help them differentiate from their
competitors. They surround themselves around a small group of friends, which
attend a lot of parties where Ben and Cam network with other people in the
industry. Even though they rarely have
any financial plans they have the passion to be successful. Ben has the better
business and marketing background, and Cam has the street-smart marketing
techniques. This episode he took advantage of uptown private school kids to
sell all the skateboard decks. Cam sold all the decks and got money for the
pattern cutter. If it wasn’t for Cam’s ambition they would’ve had to settle for
the pattern cutter and Ben would’ve of paid his rent. They paid $1500 for one
sample for their jeans, when they dropped the denim off they were complimented
how nice their denim was. I think their sample will pay off because they
started some type of business play that will help their money management. If
they stay of their grind the “Crisp” Denim will be successful.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)